One of my questions about peppers was recent retagged with vegetables
(please don't be side tracked by this, it's just what prompted the post)
Since I'm not particularly invested in this SE site, I'm just putting this out there for you lot (the local community) to discuss, but I don't think this is a very good tag, because it feels very much like a meta-tag to me.
Specifically, the identifying points of a meta tag are:
- If the tag can’t work as the only tag on a question, it’s probably a meta-tag. Every tag you use should be able to work, more or less, as the only tag on a question. Meta-tags, like [beginner], [subjective], and [best-practices], are useless by themselves — they tell you nothing at all about the content of the question.
- If the tag commonly means different things to different people, it’s probably a meta-tag. In a cruel, ironic twist, the meaning of the tag [subjective] itself … is actually subjective. Ditto for [best-practices] and [beginner]. Best practices to whom? Beginner by what criteria? These tags are impossible to define by anything remotely resembling an objective metric. In comparison, the the meaning of tags like [java], [c#], and [javascript] are crystal clear to all but the nuttiest of nutbags.
The current tag wiki for vegetables indicates:
Use this tag for general questions about growing vegetables or for questions about a particular vegetable in combination with the specific tag for that vegetable.
Which makes it entirely clear that this tag shouldn't be used on it's own.
If a tag cannot be used on its own, is it useful?
Using my question as an example, it was already tagged peppers, so what value does vegetables add?
If a question was just tagged vegetables, what would that question be about?
Really, is this much better than a theoretical gardening tag?